Which statement best describes molluscum contagiosum management when the diagnosis is clear and lesions are asymptomatic?

Study for the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination (MCCQE) I. Engage with flashcards and multiple-choice questions with detailed feedback. Prepare confidently!

Multiple Choice

Which statement best describes molluscum contagiosum management when the diagnosis is clear and lesions are asymptomatic?

Molluscum contagiosum lesions are caused by a poxvirus and, in otherwise healthy individuals, tend to resolve on their own over time. When the diagnosis is clear and the lesions are asymptomatic, removing the lesions with a curette can be a practical option because it gives rapid, definitive removal of infected tissue, quickly reducing the viral load at those sites. This immediate removal also helps minimize autoinoculation to other body parts and can shorten the overall course of the infection, which is especially appealing for patients who want quicker cosmetic or relief from ongoing lesions. Destruction of the lesions in the office is typically a quick procedure and is generally well tolerated, though it can cause brief discomfort, bleeding, and a small risk of scarring—more relevant in sensitive areas or when lesions are numerous. For that reason, many clinicians reserve curettage for lesions that are bothersome, persistent, or in cosmetically important areas, while observation remains a reasonable approach in cases with minimal concern and where spontaneous resolution is acceptable. In contrast, reassurance and observation would be favored if the goal is to avoid procedures entirely and rely on natural resolution, but when rapid clearance and reduced transmission risk are prioritized and the patient is an appropriate candidate for a minor office procedure, immediate curettage becomes a strong option.

Molluscum contagiosum lesions are caused by a poxvirus and, in otherwise healthy individuals, tend to resolve on their own over time. When the diagnosis is clear and the lesions are asymptomatic, removing the lesions with a curette can be a practical option because it gives rapid, definitive removal of infected tissue, quickly reducing the viral load at those sites. This immediate removal also helps minimize autoinoculation to other body parts and can shorten the overall course of the infection, which is especially appealing for patients who want quicker cosmetic or relief from ongoing lesions.

Destruction of the lesions in the office is typically a quick procedure and is generally well tolerated, though it can cause brief discomfort, bleeding, and a small risk of scarring—more relevant in sensitive areas or when lesions are numerous. For that reason, many clinicians reserve curettage for lesions that are bothersome, persistent, or in cosmetically important areas, while observation remains a reasonable approach in cases with minimal concern and where spontaneous resolution is acceptable.

In contrast, reassurance and observation would be favored if the goal is to avoid procedures entirely and rely on natural resolution, but when rapid clearance and reduced transmission risk are prioritized and the patient is an appropriate candidate for a minor office procedure, immediate curettage becomes a strong option.

More practice questions